Great analysis, Adam. I saw similar numbers on Brown this morning, and it really puts things into perspective.
I know I previously argued that Brown was the guy to build around based on leadership, but clearly, front-office metrics won out over my eye test.
Since that ship has sailed—and given that next year is still a development year anyway—the play now is to treat Paul George as a short-term asset. We should flip him for quality, upper-mid-level depth to re-balance the roster. He's a Simons-esque bridge piece—perfect for extracting draft picks, young players, and cap relief before we move on.
Thanks for talking me down, this is a good take. I'm in the same place where I can come to terms with it (though I wish Brown had been a Celtic for life) because of the numbers, I just hate the 76ers part of it.
I don't hate the trade. I was just hoping Boston would get a war chest of draft picks in return-similar to what OKC got from the Clippers for Paul George. But, I'm sure the advanced numbers on Jaylen contributed to that not happening.
Another great analysis Adam, just find it hard to believe that this was the best offer Stevens could get. I knew they could not keep and extend Brown and Tatum at their age but thought Denver Charlotte Portland NOLA, Spurs could offer more. Did Portland choose Ja at $40M+ over Brown? Hoping he can find a team that's close that need that Paul George vet presence that is willing to make a move for younger talent but that a big salary. As we have seen with Holiday and others maybe White soon, if brad feels he isn't getting the value for the contract, he will move it. Hoping we can get Kuminga Murphy or Cam Johnson or other value with the exception and for White Hauser Pritchard. Would try Pritchard back home for Scoot Henderson. It does appear we will get the Clippers first in 2028 if between 1-16
thanks Adam, must admit I still feel unstable; but you've given the best and most nuanced perspective on this trade so far. Well done and thanks for that. My worry is that the 2026/7 Celtics are going to old in a league that is quickly getting younger (and faster). But probably, as you pointed out, this trade is all about optionality and (cap) flexibility. Though...if Brad thinks that JB's contract hurts, he was the one to sign it in the first place ?
Great analysis, Adam. I saw similar numbers on Brown this morning, and it really puts things into perspective.
I know I previously argued that Brown was the guy to build around based on leadership, but clearly, front-office metrics won out over my eye test.
Since that ship has sailed—and given that next year is still a development year anyway—the play now is to treat Paul George as a short-term asset. We should flip him for quality, upper-mid-level depth to re-balance the roster. He's a Simons-esque bridge piece—perfect for extracting draft picks, young players, and cap relief before we move on.
Thanks for talking me down, this is a good take. I'm in the same place where I can come to terms with it (though I wish Brown had been a Celtic for life) because of the numbers, I just hate the 76ers part of it.
I don't hate the trade. I was just hoping Boston would get a war chest of draft picks in return-similar to what OKC got from the Clippers for Paul George. But, I'm sure the advanced numbers on Jaylen contributed to that not happening.
Another great analysis Adam, just find it hard to believe that this was the best offer Stevens could get. I knew they could not keep and extend Brown and Tatum at their age but thought Denver Charlotte Portland NOLA, Spurs could offer more. Did Portland choose Ja at $40M+ over Brown? Hoping he can find a team that's close that need that Paul George vet presence that is willing to make a move for younger talent but that a big salary. As we have seen with Holiday and others maybe White soon, if brad feels he isn't getting the value for the contract, he will move it. Hoping we can get Kuminga Murphy or Cam Johnson or other value with the exception and for White Hauser Pritchard. Would try Pritchard back home for Scoot Henderson. It does appear we will get the Clippers first in 2028 if between 1-16
thanks Adam, must admit I still feel unstable; but you've given the best and most nuanced perspective on this trade so far. Well done and thanks for that. My worry is that the 2026/7 Celtics are going to old in a league that is quickly getting younger (and faster). But probably, as you pointed out, this trade is all about optionality and (cap) flexibility. Though...if Brad thinks that JB's contract hurts, he was the one to sign it in the first place ?